Monday, August 8, 2016

Nike Zoom Streak 6 Review

I was intrigued with the Nike Zoom Streak 6 as soon as photos were available.  It is rare that a shoe company so drastically changes a class racing shoe.  And when those big changes happen, the result can be either extremely disappointing (which seems to be more common) or pleasantly surprising.  Having tried and been very disappointed with version 5, I saw version 6 as a dramatic change with incredible potential.  The change to a square toe-box, a lighter weight, a pebax plate and an 8mm drop?  Sounds like a perfect shoe.  I managed to get my hands on a pair early and did an initial review (HERE) but had to return them due to financial reasons (I was a graduate student and now a recent graduate with boards coming in October).  A couple weeks ago I managed to save enough money from tutoring to finally be able to afford a pair and it was one of the best investments I made shoe-wise for me.  Below are my updated thoughts after many workouts and a fast but hilly 5k race.


Sole, Ride, Drop and Weight

    The Nike Streak 6 is a VERY different shoe that version 5.  Gone is narrow last of the forefoot and in it's place a wide, footshaped and very stable forefoot.  The increased surface area and width of the new forefoot makes the front of the shoe very stable which seems to help stabilize and direct forces appropriately during toe-off.  The midfoot and heel continue to have a relatively narrow last width, but due to the switch from cushlon (v5) to phylon (v6), the improved firmness seems to continue to help stability.  The zoom air unit in the heel is integrated very well into the sole.  It contributes to the Streak 6's very smooth landing if your initial contact point is at the heel and facilitates the forward progression of the foot and lower extremity very well.
   Aside from the wonderful forefoot fit, the two other awesome changes to this shoe are the decrease in drop to an 8mm drop and the addition of a Pebax plate.  The 8mm drop definitely smooths out the ride and for me is the perfect ramp for a long distance racer.  Just enough not to mash up your calves but still let you get up on your toes and sprint when you need to (this is a personal preference.  Others will be able to handle less or more depending on your experience, mechanics and more).
   The Pebax plate adds a significant amount of speed and responsiveness to this shoe when you push the pace.  Initially when I put the shoe on I assume it would ride like any other long distance racer, but upon pushing to or past 5k pace, the plate assists in giving this shoe a beautiful amount of versatility (would personally choose lighter options for a 5k, but to each their own).


  What surprised me the most about the Streak 6 was the amount of cushioning and protection the shoe affords despite the other aggressive attributes (low weight and pebax plate).  The great amount of protection in this shoe mixes very well with the 6.4 ounce weight.  The Streak 6 disappears off my foot during workouts, races and other runs due to the weight, but has enough protection to keep my legs from getting beat up like they would in 5k-10k racers.  The protection and relative cushioning for a racing flat (again compared to a 5k-10k racer) initially makes this shoe feel like it should be heavier, but on the run it flies and that low weight becomes apparent by the speed (which I think the Pebax plate assists with).
   Although the shoe is light, durability has been decent.  The firmer rubber at the forefoot and the heel have held up very well during the almost 80 miles I have put on the Nike Streak 6.  With increased firmness always comes increased durability.  The soft midfoot section though has been getting a bit shredded, but since most forces are either generated at the heel or forefoot, it has been holding up fairly well for me.  The Nike Streak 6 is definitely NOT a shoe I would expect to get +400 miles on (although I am sure someone else will), but I fully expect at least 200-250 miles in my pair (although to be honest I'm hoping these burn out early so I can get my hands on the awesome Clear Jade/Green colorway that came out recently).  


Fit, Feel & the Upper

    The toebox is much more square shaped than previous versions and allows the forefoot to have the potential to sit in a more natural position in the shoe.  I say potential because if you don't have normal mobility, flexibility and strength, a shoe is not going to fix your problems (my Physical Therapy hat is always on).  The best part in my mind beyond the square shape is that the first toe has the potential to be straight thanks to the main curve in the shoe occurring on the lateral side as opposed to curving tightly around the first toe.  So you actually have the potential for your abductor hallucis (musclse on the side of your big toe, which are very important yet are stretched out and weak in most individuals) muscles to work and help stabilize the first ray.
    Although the upper fits very well, I should mention that this shoe fits about 1/4 size small.  For those that are running sockless or in very thin socks (I wear thin Drymax socks during workouts and races in this shoe), this shoe should fit closely in their normal size.  For those wearing normal width socks or are between sizes, I would go up a half size.  Other individuals have also reported going up a half size eliminates the insole arch pushing into their foot, but I have not had that issue at all and went with my normal size 10.  I prefer my racing flats to fit close and stayed with my normal size in this shoe.   There is also an internal arch strap that is supposed to hold the foot better.  That may be what is hitting some individuals wrong.  I tend to tie my racing flats pretty tight, so am unsure if the strap helps, but the upper overall holds the foot extremely well.
    Overall the upper is fairly minimal and light.  Thanks to the new toebox shape combined with the mild flexibility of the upper, the Streak 6 conforms very well to the foot and you will totally forget about it on the run (unless you have the wrong size as some individuals have had issues with).  The ventilation is fantastic thanks to the light mesh throughout the shoe (you can almost see your foot through it).  So far durability has been great, my only issue has been with having a white shoe that shoes every speck of dirt you pick up.


Responsiveness and Use:

   The Nike Streak 6 is definitely a long distance 10k to Marathon racer.  The Pebax plate does contribute nicely to increase the amount of responsiveness that does give this shoe the option of hitting a quick 5k (again as mentioned earlier I would probably use a different shoe, but they worked well for me in a recent race).  The cushioning and responsiveness are balanced nicely in that I can warm-up, do a race or work-out and comfortably cool-down in them.  This is is rare for many racing shoes and speaks to the versatility of this shoe.  As I mentioned in my initial review, for those that like to both race and train in lightweight racers or minimalist shoes, this will be a great do-it all shoe that can definitely handle the distance of training miles, workouts and racing.  Most people will not be able to do this, but for those who do train like this, give these a look.  
    I have used this shoe not only as a 5k racer but for every type of workout and the Streak 6 handled each well.  Speed workouts, hill repeats, tempo runs, mile repeats and races.  This is definitely a do-it-all shoe.  That being said, I still think the Nike Streak 6 will shine best as a half to full marathon racer for strong individuals and a 10k to half marathon racer for many others.  The great protection combined with awesome responsiveness make this a versatile racer that will carry you through any distance.


Thoughts as a DPT (Student)

  A foot shaped toe-box from Nike.  Wow.  First it happened in the Streak LT 3 (although that whole shoe is narrow overall) and now on one of the most classic marathon racers (a similar design is being added to the Nike Victory 3 track spike if you have seen photos).  As I mentioned earlier, this allows proper alignment of great toe and may help facilitate toe-off at an appropriate spot (rather than over the medial 1st joint of the toe, aka 1st MTP or over the 2nd and third toes).  Obviously you need to ensure that you have enough calf length, a healthy plantar fascia and enough great toe extension (at least 60 degrees) to achieve this.  The change in design definitely allows a better facilitation of this important biomechanical function (called the Windlass Mechanism).  When the first toe is pushed laterally, it is not able to go into extension as well during toe-off.  This severally impedes the forefoot rocker (the rockers of the foot, heel, ankle and forefoot, are mechanisms that make gait more efficient and help preserve forward momentum) and instead of the toe extending and the calves generating force that pushes you forward, stiff toes mean your calves tend to push you upward, creating greater vertical oscillation and wasting energy.  Additionally, when that first toe is held in an adduction you are more likely to roll off the medial side of the metarasal phalangeal joint.  This area is not usually supposed to have such high amounts of force placed upon it and per Wolff's Law which states a bone in a normal individual will respond to the forces placed upon it by first thickening and then increasing the external cortical portion of the bone... you start to get a bunion!!  I've touched on this before, but always love returning and reminding people that those are not magic and don't just happen magically.  The body responds to the forces placed upon it.  So if you put your feet in those kind of positions for years and years or lack the mobility necessary to move correctly.....
  Back on topic.  I am very happy with not only the addition of the pebax plate, but also the correct placement.  These plates should be placed in the midfoot to forefoot, as that is where force is being applied into the ground AND where the foot actually bends in the forward direction.  I have observed a few companies recently putting the plate too far posterioly (toward the heel), which creates some issues.  First of all there is no joint in the heel to midfoot area that bends in the sagittal plane (forward and backward).  With no bend, you are not really going to engage that plate to help you with forward propulsion.  This is the same reason why you should NOT put major flex points in the sagittal plane (front and back) at these parts of the shoe (as opposed to the newer versions of the Nike Free, which actually had diagonal flex grooves in that area that are closer to the set up of those joints... but not perfect)!  Secondly, when you put a plate that stiffens up this area, you restrict other motions, most importantly is the unlocking of the midfoot that is required for you to pronate correctly.  I've said this a million times.  Pronation is NOT bad.  It is a method of shock absorption present in the foot that when controlled will seriously protect the joints above.  When it is uncontrolled, then forces go in all directions and the joints above collapse (because they don't have a stable base to work on).  You should have some degree of pronation.  If you have a stiff and/or rigid foot (which I see commonly in patients with pes cavus or high and/or stiff arches), you will not be able to load forces correctly at the foot and will have to do extra work further up the chain (knee, hip, back, etc).  So this is a delicate balance.  When you have a very stiff plate at the heel/midfoot, you may limit the movement in the frontal plane (side to side) of the midfoot.  This will likely limit the unlocking of the navicular (big bone on the inside of your foot), which facilitates the pronatory motion.  So for those with very tight calves, these shoes will seem like zero drop shoes because you will not be able to compensate for your lack of dorsiflexion at your talocrural (ankle) joint with extra eversion at your at the joint blow (subtalar) and midfoot.  For those with proper mobility and control in their ankle joints, they may not notice this as much.  For those individuals who mostly load and absorb shock at their ankles, plates in the heel to midfoot may limit your normal force attenuation abilities.  So keep that in mind.
    And finally to end this section off, I am very interested to see Nike add a bit of rocker shape to this shoe.  It is evident from looking at this shoe from a lateral or medial view and may be what contributes to the additional smoothness of the ride.  Unlike some companies however, the rocker is mild and does not feel unnatural.  The curve at the heel mimics and facilitates the heel rocker (curve at the posterior calcaneus bone) and the mild toe spring combined with great flexibility (which I forgot to mention earlier) compliments the forefoot rocker very well.  This shoe does a great number of biomechanical things correctly and I applaud the footwear developers and staff at Nike for their work on this shoe.


Conclusion & Best For:

    The Nike Streak 6 has become my new favorite all around racing flat.  It can handle a 5k race (ran 15:39 on a very hilly course in this shoe) while also taking on marathon distances, all types of workouts and long runs with ease.  The combination of cushioning, lightweight and responsiveness mix very well in this shoe and make it a highly versatile racer.  The Nike Streak 6 would work best for those with stable and strong lower extremities and feet looking for a versatile racer and shoe for workouts.  Those with extremely unstable or weak lower extremities and feet would be better off looking at more stable racing flats along with seeing a physical therapist to address any issues that may be causing those impairments.

Thanks for reading and don't forget to Tack On!

Disclaimer: These shoes were purchased on Running Warehouse for their full US retail price.  I put at least 75 miles on every pair of shoes before I review them (except racing flats which I put on at least 25 miles).  Currently I have 77 miles on my pair.

As always, my views are my own.  My blog should not and does not serve as a replacement for seeking professional medical care.  If you are currently injured or concerned about an injury, please see your local running physical therapist.

-Matt Klein, DPT

(wow that was a long review....)

21 comments:

  1. Great review! Any comparison you might offer vs Takumi Sen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you!

      Compared to the Takumi Sen 3, the Streak 6 has a much more consistent feel throughout the sole, as opposed to the weird and cheap feeling EVA in the Sen that transitions to the forefoot boost. The Streak 6 has far more cushioning underfoot and more drop, but the pebax plate creates a great deal more responsiveness in the midsole. So overall the Streak 6 is much more versatile, whereas the Takumi Sen 3 feels like it really is limited to the 5k/10k and maybe up to the HM if you have really good calf length and strength (as always your ability to handle a distance in a certain shoe will depending on what you are used to, training history, strength, biomechanics and other factors, so it may vary). The Streak 6's 8mm drop still feels fast thanks to the plate I mentioned, but your calves with thank you over long distance races. The upper is thicker in the Takumi Sen 3 and tapers like normal shoes at the toes. The Streak 6 has a great upper the not only breathes very well but has a square toebox that fits the foot very well without being too loose.

      If we are talking about the Takumi Sen v1 or v2, it would be a close call because of how much I loved the extended forefoot torsion system that made those shoes so fast and responsive (plus the classive Japanese design looked great). Now comparing the Streak 6 to the Takumi Sen 3, I would choose the Streak 6 almost any day.

      Hope that helps and thanks for reading.

      -Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
  2. Thanks! Very helpful insight. I am looking for a race shoe for Berlin - did a 6 mile tempo in the Takumi's (37 min or so) and there is no way another 20 would treat the calves well. Might try these new Streaks. Backup plan is original Adidas Adios (still love them although a tad heavy - I have the yellow ones on RW - I seem to get a lot more pop / forward momentum vs say the Kinvara) or adios Boost 3 (have not tried).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Matt, any views on the flyknit version of the Streak 6 and how it compares to the one you just reviewed? (Amazing review by the way!). Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello!

      I have not gotten to try the Flyknit version yet but will update this as soon as I do! Glad you enjoyed the review!

      Thanks for reading!

      -Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
  4. Hi Matt, would you recommend the Nike Zoom Streak 6 or Nike Zoom Streak LT 3 for road 5k's & 10k's? Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey John!

      It depends on what you are used to! Both are fast, but it comes down to what you prefer in cushioning and heel drop (3-4mm vs 8mm). I have used both for both races. I prefer the Streak LT 3 for the 5k and the Streak 6 for longer distance races. The Streak 6 is far for versatile with the increase in cushioning, which makes it a great 10k-Marathon racer as well as workout/very lightweight trainer (if you are durable/strong enough). The Streak LT 3 is very much a light fast racer that works well in short road races, XC races and track races. So I would suggest the Streak LT 3 for 5ks and the Streak 6 for 10ks and up.

      Hope that helps!

      -Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
  5. Hi Matt,

    Have you tried the Adidas Boston boost 5's? I'm looking for a comparison between the two but can't find anything online. Your review is so far the most detailed one I've stumbled upon.

    Awesome!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you!

      I have tried the Boston Boost 5 and was very turned off by the heavy overlays that made a fast tapered and narrow forefoot (I returned them immediately). The Streak 6 is far closer to the Adios Boost 2 or 3 than the Boston 5. The Boston 6 did away with the heavy overlays which is SUPPOSED to make them fit a bit better, but word on the street is they are even narrower. Again if you are looking for Adidas's long distance racer as the Streak 6 is for Nike, I would take a look at the Adidas Adios Boost 2 or 3 (3 fits wider in the forefoot).

      Hope that helps!

      -Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
    2. Thanks Matt!

      Ordered my pair (on sale @Nike.ca and ebates has their anniversary sale)

      Also like all the anatomical references (I'm an RMT). Funny thing, I went to a Adidas speed workout last night and they had the Boston 6's to demo.

      I actually like them more than my 5's (minus the color I got them in which is awesome) I do fight the show is lighter now that they changed the materials at the top and find it less restrictive than the 5's though the 5's were never an issue for me know terms with that. They kept the bottom soles and boost technology the same.

      If you're ever in Toronto you should check out either the Nike or Adidas run groups and they even have trial vans on site.

      Regards,

      RMT

      Delete
  6. Very well thought through review, thank you. Please can you tell me how the forefoot and mid foot stability compares to that of the Adios Boost?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Mike. The forefoot of the Streak 6 is by far the most stable part of the shoe. It makes for a very nice and stable toe-off. The midfoot and heel part of the sole run narrow and are not quiet as stable. The Adios Boost 3 on the other hand has a similar narrowish midfoot but the heel is wider and a bit more stable. Overall these two shoes do not have "true" stability elements. However the wider forefoot base along with the plate of the Streak 6 makes it feel more stable to me overall than the Adios Boost 3, whose extended forefoot torsion system has become more flexible and does not counter the effects of the softer boost as well.

      Hope that helps.

      Dr. Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
  7. Thanks Matt for the great review.. I'm really excited about this shoe.. I'm not a Nike customer, this would be my first pair.. I've been using Saucony.. Kinvara 5, Kinvara 6 (2 pairs) and now Kinvara 7.. My favourite distance is marathon. Do you recommend this shoe? My pb on marathon is 3h:15m.
    Thanks in advance..
    Best regards

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Kamm.

      I do recommend this shoe if you can handle neutral shoes. Be aware that the drop will be a little higher than that of the Kinvara (8mm vs 4mm). Other than that, the streak 6 is lighter (6.5ish ounces), has a similar forefoot stack height but higher stack height in the heel. Plus the plate will make the Streak 6 will be more responsive (in my mind).

      I'd say try it before you buy it. It is a fantastic racing shoe, especially for long distances.

      Thanks for reading and hope that helps.

      -Dr. Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
    2. It's been a while since your recommendation but i prefer to thank you again. I buy the Nike Streak 6, and i'm very satisfied with the shoes. I was able to achieve my PB on 10k, achieving my first sub40 minutes.
      Best regards

      Delete
  8. Hi Matt,
    I'm looking for a light weight 10K-half marathon racing flat and I'm torn between the Streak 6 and the Saucony A6. I want a light responsive shoe and I was leaning towards the A6 in terms of weight and stack height, but the Streak 6 has the pebax plate. How do the differ in terms of responsiveness? Do you have any other suggestions for half marathon flats? I tried the Gel Hyperspeed 7 but found it too soft and not responsive enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The cushioning and responsiveness of the Streak 6 make it a far better long distance racer than the A6. I use the Streak 6 for everything, but it is meant as a 10k-full marathon shoe and that is where it shines.

      I have found both the A6 and Streak 6 responsive, but the Streak 6 wins hands down with the ability to handle a variety of training and racing distances (plus it has been way more durable for me).

      The Streak 6 may be your best bet if the Hyperspeed was too soft (I experienced the same). The Adios is too soft now and weighs 8.1 oz. The Tarther racers from Asics (on Running Warehouse) may be worth a shot, but again the Streak 6 is far smoother. The Takumi Sen 3 is another, but I have found that shoe to be overpriced. The Boost gives good forefoot cushioning, but to me it is a better 5k-10k racer.

      Hope that helps.

      -Dr. Matt Klein, DPT

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the quick and in-depth response, I think I'll try the Streak 6

      Delete
  9. These shoes look great, when were they released? i've been looking for excellent spikeless golf shoes for myself for a long time. this article - http://www.golfclubsguru.com/best-spikeless-golf-shoes/ - also had listed this Nike shoe, and i'm probably going to just buy this one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Mr Klein!
    I'm Thiago from Brazil and I'm looking a Nike Zoom Streak 6 to buy. So I would like to ask you if you have any more review about it? How many miles could I run with it until "broke" its cushioning or outsole/midsole?
    Thanks a lot for your atention!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Tiago.

      The Streak 6 is now my favorite racing shoe. I currently have two pair, one with >200 miles and one with about 70. Both are still going very strong and have very little wear. So if you are looking for a racing shoe that is very versatile (can handle 5k to half marathon for most, past marathon for others) check this shoe out. My +200 mile pair still has plenty of life left and the outsole has only a little wear.

      Hope that helps and thanks for reading.

      -Dr. Matthew Klein, PT, DPT

      Delete